4.1/5
Connectivity3.5/5
Maintenance3.5/5
Construction3.9/5
Social Life3.6/5
AmenitiesOwner | 4 months ago
The Flats layout are good and the amenities are average in the society. society is good.
The maintenance the finishing and the plaster work is not upto the mark in the society.
Owner | 4 months ago
The amenities are good enough in the society. The people are good and cooperative in the society.
The construction quality is worst and the connectivity is very bad in the society.
Owner | 4 months ago
People of this society are good and the maintenance are good. greenery area available.
The amenities and the liveability of this apartment are not good and upto mark.
Owner | 4 months ago
People of this society are friendly, Location of this society is very good. Lifts are working fine.
Maintenance and cleanliness is below average. Metro station is far away from the society.
Owner | 4 months ago
Cleanliness is maintained in the society. Maintenance respond on time. Park is also good.
Stray dogs are there in the society. Maintenance of the park can be improved.
Owner | 4 months ago
The park of the society is very good. Their kids play safely. overyall everything is good.
The build quality is very bad and the structure is also very bad. Not satisfied.
Owner | 4 months ago
The organising society is very good. The parking is also good in the society.
The political members are not good. The people are not cooperative in the society.
Owner | 4 months ago
The location and places in society is great. Facilities like water and electricity is good.
Lift efficiency can be improved. The ATM in the society is not functional 24/7
Owner | 4 months ago
Location of the society and maintenance is also responsive. Spacious and also the flats are big.
Low amenities as compared to other societies. park is also small in the society.
Owner | 4 months ago
The people are good in nature. The club house is good. The park is kinda good.
The construction quality of the society is not good enough. The connectivity is bad.